Full explanation
Why IFRS 9 requires fair value, not face value
IFRS 9 paragraph 5.1.1 requires all financial assets to be initially measured at fair value. For a standard market-rate loan, fair value equals the amount lent — because the terms are at market. For a below-market or zero-interest loan, the fair value is lower than the face amount, because a lender would normally demand interest. The fair value is found by discounting the future cash flows at the market rate for an equivalent instrument.
IFRS 9 Appendix B paragraph B5.1.1 goes further: where a financial instrument is issued at below-market terms, the difference between fair value and the transaction amount is accounted for according to the substance of the arrangement. For a parent-to-subsidiary loan, the substance is a capital contribution — the parent is effectively injecting equity into the subsidiary without receiving a market return.
The scenario: €200,000 zero-interest loan, three years, market rate 8%
Fair value at inception: €200,000 / 1.08³ = €200,000 / 1.259712 = €158,766. Day-one adjustment: €200,000 − €158,766 = €41,234. This €41,234 is not a loss — it is an additional investment in the subsidiary, recognised as an increase in the investment account in the parent's separate financial statements.
Journal entry at inception
Dr Loan receivable (financial asset at amortised cost) €158,766
Dr Investment in subsidiary €41,234
Cr Cash €200,000
EIR accretion — three years to face value
The loan is subsequently measured at amortised cost using the EIR of 8%.
Year 1: Opening €158,766 × 8% = €12,701 interest income. Closing: €171,467. Dr Loan receivable €12,701 / Cr Interest income €12,701.
Year 2: Opening €171,467 × 8% = €13,717. Closing: €185,184.
Year 3: Opening €185,184 × 8% = €14,815. Closing: €200,000 (repaid). Total interest income over three years: €41,233 — approximately equal to the day-one adjustment (rounding).
Common mistake: recording at face value
If the parent records Dr Loan receivable €200,000 / Cr Cash €200,000, three errors follow: the loan asset is overstated by €41,234; no equity contribution is recognised in the investment account; and interest income over three years is zero instead of €41,233. The parent's reported income from the subsidiary is understated and the investment account misrepresents the true economic cost of the lending arrangement.
